Thoughts on Combat Reports

Regular followers of this blog will have read that throughout September and October 1943 the Group were becoming increasingly involved in combat situations that brought them both victories and losses. At the moment I am presenting the reports for each mission, but this has given me pause for thought about the picture it presents about what exactly the Group was doing.

I do not, for instance, include transcripts of combat reports filed after action. These are readily available from numerous sources, but it is purely from a practical perspective in the time I have available that I do not include them. This does mean that the general reader could take away from this blog a rather clean and sterile version of the air war. Here is a quote from an October 1943 combat report to underline the point:

I pulled out to the right side as I went by and saw a number 4 painted on the side. The pilot seemed to be forward in the cockpit and I expect he must have been dead. I was disappointed the plane did not blow up completely for it certainly did take lots of hits.

Clearly, the pilots of the 353rd were involved in a vicious war in which they and their opponents risked their lives on a daily basis. Fighter pilots were glamorous and exciting, but there was also an unpleasant side to what they had to do. They were trained to kill and destroy targets in the air and on the ground without a second thought.

At one level you can, of course, take the view that the job was entirely necessary to eradicate the aggressive Nazi regime that had brought untold calamity into the world. Aggression was necessary to fight aggression and it is unsurprising that we see such reports coming from the Group. Equally though, when I write that an Me109 or Fw190 is destroyed I am really saying that there is a high chance that the pilot has been killed in an unpleasant fashion. At the individual level the war was full of moral ambiguities and we cannot know whether the enemy pilot was a committed Nazi or just a young man who felt he was defending his homeland. A philosopher would, no doubt, expand on this debate, but the most I am prepared to say is that it was another human life tragically lost in a terrible war.

My approach to this subject hopefully recognises and underlines the historical significance of the events, but I want to make it clear that it is not my intention to glorify war or avoid its realities.  The fact that I talk of aces, victories and scores is a function of the material I am dealing with and does not mean that I underestimate the gravity of what went on. Over the years I have known many members of the Group as friends and, whilst they fondly remembered their association, I do not think I ever met a pilot who wanted to repeat the events I discuss…


Filed under 353rd Fighter Group

2 responses to “Thoughts on Combat Reports

  1. David Mccloskey

    You are retelling the tale of a specific group of men I regard as the greatest generation. Not only did they do their duty for love of country, but they helped build the USA post war. The success these men and women had during the war was translated into their businesses and family lives after the war. Unfortunately, I feel the way of life these men worked so hard to build is being slowly eroded by politics, but they stand as a shining beacon of what can and should be.

  2. What I am aiming to do here is present the historical record and share any thoughts it provokes. Rather than with a book, I’m largely leaving readers to draw their own conclusions from a lot of what is presented here. My main concern here was that the statistical nature of the material would give the impression I was being insensitive to what was really going on.
    I’ve said elsewhere on the blog that it is a historical exercise and is not intended as a commemoration or celebration. Commemoration, to my mind, is found at a level beyond anything I could achieve personally at deeply moving places like Madingley and the memorials at Goxhill, Metfield and Raydon. For celebration mixed with commemoration I don’t think you could beat places like Duxford, the Air Force Museum at Dayton and, particularly, the 8th AF Museum at Savannah.
    The idea of a “Greatest Generation” was famously put forward by Tom Brockaw in his book of that title. If anyone is interested in the complexities of America’s WWII experience a good starting point is Studs Terkel’s The Good War: An Oral History of World War II (1997). If you are looking for a more academic analysis of the way Americans remember WWII then John Bodnar’s The “Good War” in American Memory (2010) is difficult to beat.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s